Northants Police to Target Taxis and Vans

This BBC report says that Northamptonshire police are set to target poor driving standards amongst taxi drivers and vans. Well, they have their work cut out there.

The story says, though, that:

Officers will be carrying out checks to make sure that all Hackney and private hire drivers and their vehicles are properly licensed…

Sgt Bob French, coordinating the operation, said: “Driving under the influence of drink or drugs, using a mobile phone, speeding and not wearing a seatbelt are the four key causes of collisions involving death or serious injury.”

Right. So it’s not really going after bad drivers – just the usual relatively soft targets. After all, the police should already be targeting drink, drugs, mobile phones, and seatbelts. Shouldn’t they?

If the police want to impress the public with something that’s really new, perhaps they should target taxi drivers who stop or turn wherever the hell they want, whenever the hell they want, whatever the signs or yellow lines say. That’s far more important to me than whether or not a taxi has got a valid licence to pick up fares.

And the same goes for van drivers – ALL van drivers, Yes, including those who work FOR the councils who are involved in this operation. Dustbin lorry drivers are some of the most arrogant prats on the road, deliberately stopping between parked cars and reversing into narrow roads to empty bins, and causing major hold-ups (usually during morning rush hour).

The smell of hypocrisy is strong in this one!

Confused? Well, This Lot Are

A potentially very informative article in the Leighton Buzzard Observer is marred by stupid comments by someone who likes to think they have authority. They don’t.

The article starts out with some statistics, showing how compliance with urban speed limits is improving and pedestrian fatalities are falling (data covering 2003-present). So far, so good.

But then, IAM (Institute of Advanced Motorists) gets involved and the focus shifts somewhat.

Bearing in mind that the statistics show that fatalities are falling, IAM says:

In the UK, between two-thirds and three-quarters of fatalities occur on rural roads, yet driving on rural roads still isn’t a mandatory part of the basic driving test.

Most young drivers get plenty of exposure to urban hazards but often their first experience of a rural road comes after the test when they are on their own. This is unacceptable.

It doesn’t matter if 10,000 people are killed, or only 10. Three quarters remains three quarters as a statistic, and it reflects the relative safety of rural roads. Nothing will alter the fact that rural roads contain more hazards – other than filling them all in, or converting them all to A roads and straightening them.

And as for rural roads being mandatory on the test… how? Many test centres and cities have no rural routes within 40 minutes’ drive, so how would they do it?

I’m not saying rural roads shouldn’t be covered where possible (and some Nottingham routes do contain such roads), but demanding that they be mandatory? Someone is out of touch with reality again.

Electric Cars Get Greedy

I’ve written about electric cars on a number of occasions. My scepticism over their future has never really been in doubt.

So this latest story just about made me inhale a full cup of tea when I saw it!

Induction CoilMany, many, many, many, many… you get the idea… years ago, I saw a documentary where they had “transmitted” electricity a few metres across an office to light a bulb. The presenter even stood in the middle to show how safe it was. One thing he didn’t go into detail about, as far as I remember, is how inefficient this was. You might consume 100 watts of power on the transmitter side, but far less than that made it across the void to be used by whatever it was you were powering.

In a nutshell, it is extremely wasteful – and quite franky, no amount of technological advancement can make this kind of thing as efficient as powering directly from the source.

Now, when you bear in mind that the same thing (overall inefficiency) already applies to electric cars – instead of generating the power on-board (as in an engine), you have to burn some fossil fuel, convert it to electricity, store it, then transport it, all at additional energy cost – it has to be the most bizarre idea imaginable that anyone should propose that induction coils be installed in the road so that these ridiculous devices can be charged up at the same time they are driving around (or parked).

The whole ethic of the electric car shouts GREEN. Induction loops shout HYPOCRISY.

Dead Parrot Sketch

I love this one from the Daily Mirror in the week!

ParrotA father-of-eight (good start) was involved in a high-speed police chase through Portsmouth at 3.30 in the morning. The chase lasted for two miles and four minutes, and ended with John Williams crashing into a fence.

Williams tried to blame the episode over grief at the death of his pet parrot.

Bearing in mind that Williams has a list of previous convictions (he’s been banned from driving nine times, and at the time of the incident was on bail for stealing from a car and going equipped for theft. He was later jailed for 25 weeks for that) it is hardly surprising that he “panicked” when a police car started following him on his 3.30am drive.

He was jailed for a further 4 months and banned for another three years. Not referring to Williams, but speaking hypothetically about someone I made up with similar previous form, such a sentence could easily translate as only being banned for a couple of months until they get out and start driving in the middle of the night again. I just wonder what excuse such a person would have next time now the parrot one has been used up?

Did Satnav Error Cause Girl’s Death?

While I was checking links for that story about the learner who accidentally killed her mother, I came across this one from February (which I somehow missed at the time).

No Right TurnA father was being given a driving lesson by his wife, and they had their 4 year old daughter in the back. His satnav – an old one – told him to take a right turn across a 60mph road. Their car was t-boned by a car coming the other way and the 4-year old girl was killed.

The road signs clearly and copiously say “NO RIGHT TURN”, but older satnavs don’t contain the correct information.

Obviously, a very tragic story. The inquest decided that there was no point pressing charges, even though the driver was clearly and definitely in the wrong – a perfectly sensible decision.

However, you can’t help but think about the issue of blame and responsibility (let’s imagine no one was killed and those involved were other people, just to remove the emotion here). After all, at least one person in the car was an allegedly qualified driver, and ignoring road signs is a major hazard these days for the rest of us. It couldn’t have been much of a driving lesson in terms of quality if this sort of thing was the outcome, or if they were using a satnav in the first place.

I can hear the pedants out there already, screaming: “But teaching people to use a satnav is important”. Yes, but that is almost certainly not what was happening here. If it was, the whole situation becomes ten times more serious because of the obvious ignoring of road signs involved.

Around this way, there is a NO RIGHT TURN junction on the A60 into Ruddington. It is on a blind bend, there are double white lines and a hatched region. There are appropriate signs. The speed limit is 40mph. And yet there are certain people who interpret NO RIGHT TURN as only applying to non-residents or those under the age of 60 – a handful of them use it regularly (along with a smattering of white van men who have added the inability to read road signs with pictures to their overflowing toolbox of poor literacy).

I’m always surprised at how tragedies involving children usually don’t delve into what is likely to be the usual behaviour of those involved. Like routinely taking such illegal or dangerous routes.

Maybe the authorities ought to consider that if you don’t penalise people for breaking the rules (and the law) more and more of them start to assume it is OK to do it. Not prosecuting someone for the accidental death of their own offspring is one thing, but banning them from driving due to clearly dangerous behaviour likely to impact others is another matter entirely. After all, you can’t bring a deceased child back – but you CAN do something about not adding anyone else’s to the list!

Britons NOT the Chosen Race

And certainly not when it comes to driving abroad!

Euro-UK Composite FlagWe love to whinge and whine about all those Johnny Foreigners on our roads, and how bad they are compared to us. Particularly strong feelings (coupled with limited intelligence) might be shown by also flying a Union Jack or George Cross outside their houses.

But… and this might just come as a bit of surprise to many… the Europeans see us and rubbish drivers when we’re in their countries.

This survey by AXA suggests that around 7 million British drivers will head abroad with their cars and caravans this summer. However, according to the Europeans (that is the wording of the article – I consider myself to be “European”, so let’s just take this as a collective phrase), only 20% drive carefully and only 25% understand local laws.

Main complaints about us were:

  • confusion at roundabouts
  • confusion at junctions
  • driving too slowly
  • driving on the wrong side
  • driving too fast

The article says 2 million Brits have had driving accidents abroad. British drivers were ranked 7th out of 11 European countries. Germans were voted best, and Greeks the worst.

Before I continue, if you looked at a list of what annoys British drivers about… well, British drivers, the list would be almost identical, wouldn’t it?

Well, AXA approached it from that angle and their survey reveals that 27% don’t know if a GB sticker is needed, and 21% think it isn’t. Or in other words, 48% haven’t got a clue. Furthermore, 33% didn’t know if their insurance covered them, and 66% of those thought that it did!

When asked to identify 6 Eurpean road signs, the average correct answer was 28% – so 72% were clueless there. In fact, the lowest result from these six signs suggested 85% were clueless.

I’m amazed that 51% didn’t know that their headlight beams need correcting for places where you drive on the right hand side of the road. I’ve known that since I was ten!

The article stopped short of reporting what people thought of these Johnny Foreigners daring to have different rules to us. It’s pretty clear, though: we’re not as good as we think we are – at home, or abroad.

Slow Drivers are Major Headache

This story is doing the rounds at the moment – every version stems from some “research” by confused.com. Translated into English, that means they asked a few people what annoyed them most and then put the answers into a spreadsheet. It’s hardly “research”, but it still makes interesting reading. I’ll link to a blogged version, because all the others appear to be insurance companies trying to get in on the act.

Slow DriversIn a nutshell, 60% of those questioned said slow drivers were the biggest cause of stress on the roads, and 45% of those admitted to dangerously attempting to overtake to get past them.

Department of Transport data show that 143 accidents a year are directly caused by slow drivers. Of course, those are the tip of the iceberg – how many more near misses occur due to the same cause?

There are now calls for “slow speed cameras” to be installed, or even slow lanes for these people.

There are plans for £100 spot fines for careless driving, including driving too slowly, to be introduced this year. Minimum speed limits already exist on some motorways.

Personally, I’d welcome it. However, the problems are much bigger than just making it an offence – there’s no point forcing people who can’t drive properly to drive faster. They’re bad enough as it is.

In my opinion, if someone is pulled over for driving too slowly then they should have their licence suspended and forced to take a driving improvement course of some kind.

Learner Driver Kills Her Mother

I just saw this story on the BBC website. Susan Duke, 41, suffered serious head injuries after she was hit by the car being driven by her 17-year old daughter, Lauren.

Details aren’t yet clear, but it is thought Mrs Duke was teaching her daughter at the time.

The accident happened on Monday in the car park of Cuxton Social Club near Rochester, Kent. Mrs Duke died on Wednesday of her injuries.

EDIT: The newsfeed has just told me the story is reported in The Sun. According to this article, the car involved was a Ford Ka, and Mrs Duke was outside guiding her daughter into a parking space whilst reversing.

You really have to read some of the comments people have left at the bottom of this story to realise what scum live in this country. People trying to be clever.

Even on a certain forum, one poster has said:

They look like chavs. It may be quite sad that a girl’s mother has died, but it was the mother’s fault! Who would anyone stand behind a reversing car, especially a learner. It doesn’t surprise me. With names such as ‘Brogan’ and ‘Wayne’, they aren’t the most intelligent people. And they have very common faces.

Why aren’t these people standing next to you when they come out with stuff like this?

Idiots From Overseas Drive… Badly

This article in the London Evening Standard makes interesting reading.

Uber-pratmobile is Taken AwayThe police have been “cracking down” in Knightsbridge. OK. Yah! Apparently, they seized cars like Bentleys, Porsches, Ferraris… and even a Bugatti Veyron for a variety of offences. An operation last night near Harrods involved a nhew Bentley (worth around £200,000) being seized. Offences include driving whilst banned, driving with no insurance, illegal number plates, over-tinted windows, and being arrogant twats (that last one isn’t covered by a specific law).

Residents are kept awake by the sound of these cars racing around in the early hours.

The culprits are mainly “young Middle Eastern men” – some of whom are thought to be members of the Qatari royal family. They come here to get away from the heat before Ramadan.

Plebs with absolutely no lives of their own regularly turn up to drool and take videos, which they post on YouTube.

Stupidest quote of the year (Conflicting Logic category) goes to Madeline Elson, of the Kightsbridge Association’s law and order committee (so, stupidest organisation title as well), who said:

We welcome Middle Eastern drivers to Knightsbridge to enjoy the atmosphere and freedom we offer. But perhaps the drivers of these high-performance cars are unaware that Knightsbridge has 4,000 residents, including many children.

Yeah. And I also wonder how many of their pratmobiles will end up crushed. Not many, I’ll bet!

What amazes me is that anyone would want to spend so much money on something, then try to wreck it by driving it badly. Complete morons – whatever car they drive, and wherever they come from.

Austrian Pasta Man Thinks He’s Funny

This snip in STV reports that an Austrian man has been allowed to wear a pasta strainer on his head on his driver’s licence photo.

Under the mistaken belief that he has a sense of humour, I would guess, Niko Alm said he must wear the utensil for religious reasons. He claims to be a member of the…

…Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, whose followers call themselves ‘Pastafarians’…

The Austrian authorities have taken 3 years to decide he can do this. Apparently, they asked for him to be assessed by a doctor to make sure he was mentally fit to drive.

I think the doctor should also have been asked to assess the authorities.

Incidentally, Alm is an atheist. In other words, he doesn’t have a religion – he’s just a base-level shit-stirrer.

(I won’t file this under “funny”. Alm isn’t. He’s just an idiot.)