How to Spot an Idiot

Distracted driving is big news in America at the moment. Laws are being passed in almost every state to make the use of mobile phones and especially sending text messages illegal whilst driving.

Occasionally, some state or other is unfortunate to have a complete dickhead on local government, and the laws are prevented from coming into force for some unbelievably crass reason.

See if you can spot the latest dickhead in this sentence:

AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry vetoed legislation Friday that would have banned texting while driving because he views it as “a government effort to micromanage the behavior of adults.”

Incredible, isn’t it? This imbecile believes that texting while driving is OK, because stopping it is government micromanagement. He stopped short of describing texting whilst driving as every American’s constitutional right, although that’s obviously what he was getting at.

Something I’m Not Proud Of

AshamedI took a pupil to test today whose theory test expires next week.

When I took her on, her driving had been put on hiatus by virtue of having had a baby and some other things - hence the reason for the expiry date looming. Her driving was basically OK, and she could do the manoeuvres after a bit of refresher training. But as the test date approached it became clear the real problem was her mind.

She is one of those people who, when confronted with a simple problem, experiences the equivalent of an atomic explosion in their heads that creates the most bizarre solution imaginable.

One example. I will say to her “turn right at the roundabout, 2nd exit” and she’ll check her mirrors and indicate, drive off when it is clear, and then – and only then – give any thought as to where the 2nd exit is. Her solution to this dilemma is frequently to yank the steering wheel into full lock, accelerate, and look for somewhere to go without any consideration for the island itself, bollards, other cars, and so on. This includes aiming for the wrong carriageway on a split entry road to the roundabout.

Another example. I will say to her “follow the road ahead at the lights”. She sometimes won’t see the road markings (arrows) and will just go in the direction she is currently pointing, which means the wrong lane or straddling two of them. Then she’ll yank it over without checking. And if the junction is anything other than geometrically symmetrical then “straight ahead” again becomes a gambled choice between wherever she is pointing and what other cars in front are doing.

And one more. We’ll be driving down a straight road with side roads off it. Periodically, and for no specific reason, she will react to a car appearing at the end of one of these roads (coming to give way lines) by slamming her brakes on as if they have right of way or something.

The problem is, she CAN see the road markings and she DOES know what to do. She just doesn’t do it every time.

So, I have to admit that I knew she was going to fail. I practically told her this, and I said that I wanted to be present for the test “just in case”.

Well, she DID fail. With 4 serious and a few – only a few - driver faults (I think the examiner was being generous).

It’s the first time I have ever taken anyone to test who I knew didn’t stand a chance, and I’m not proud of it. I didn’t need the work and I honestly thought I’d be able to get her ready – but I was wrong. I’ll never do it again, no matter what story the pupil gives me, and no matter how much money they’re trying to save.

Kids’ Road Safety Protest

This item appeared on my newsfeed. It’s a story about pupils from a Leeds school taking part in a protest about speed (whilst simultaneously trying to set a world record for the Biggest Walking Bus – go figure the logic here)..

Now, don’t get me wrong. Speeding is absolutely wrong, and if someone speeds and causes an accident or injury then they deserve to be locked up for a long time and never allowed to drive again.

But let’s just look at something here and try to stay in touch with reality. Julie Townsend, of Brake, says:

You never know when a child might make a mistake and run out. Your slower driving could save their life.

What this does is create a cosy little image of a Utopian society, where parents all bring up well-behaved and well-balanced children, who always take care near roads, but who – occasionally, perhaps when attracted to a jingling ice-cream van with a smiling Italian driver – can make mistakes due to their undeveloped brains and sense of self-preservation.

It ain’t like that. And especially not in certain large cities.

The reality is that many kids will deliberately walk, ride, or stand in front of your car because they know you won’t run them over. They have been brought up badly enough to develop this attitude themselves, and they are conscious and calculating over it (and a great many other things). The only thing that is “undeveloped” in them is a sense of decency.

I live in a city where kids actually retain some traces of human behaviour, instead of the bestial kind prevalent elsewhere, and this happens all the time. The kids involved can be very young – and I’m always of the opinion that if you know what you are doing then you should expect to be held responsible for it.

And adults – the parents of these little angels – are even worse. I lose count of the number of puschairs I see poking out between parked cars as the “mother” seeks to find a way across without endangering herself – usually 10 metres from a crossing. I also lose count of the number of cars with “child on board” (any of the variants) signs speeding, cutting me up, and driving extremely erratically on any given day – especially from 3pm onwards on schooldays.

If someone “makes a mistake” and runs out in front of you, 90% of the time it isn’t because they’re a kid. It’s because they’re an idiot who has had role models help them develop their behavior to where it is today.

By all means, attack speeding – true speeding. But don’t just attack cars because of stupidity and poor upbringing.

Driving Examiners to Strike? (2011 Episode)

Union LogicThe PCS Union has worked hard this last year to have its members go out on strike at all costs. It has finally succeeded. Its officials must be wetting themselves with glee now they have finally accomplished what they have been trying to do for at least the last 12 months.

Originally, they were egging on actual DSA staff to strike concerning proposed office relocations. Unfortunately, the relocation plans were shelved and the chance to strike was lost. Unfazed, they simply waited for another opportunity – this time, that old stalwart: teachers.

Sarah Robinson, a PCS branch secretary, has obviously been practising that special rhetoric that makes them sound like a bad Japanese-to-English translation, but which they nevertheless thrive on within unions:

Never before since the 1940s have workers been asked to defend our public services in the way they will in the coming months.

They’re an olive short of a pizza. Always were, always will be.

Anyway, assuming that you live in an area where union membership is more important than food, cigarettes, booze… even life, itself… then you need to keep an eye on the dates these comedians are earmarking for action when you book driving tests.

GDE Matrix Coming via a New Route?

Interesting story in the Saarbrücker Zeitung, reporting that new drivers will have to have a feedback session with a driving instructor three months after gaining their licences.

The story reports:

The Transport Ministry is drawing up the plans following the example of Austria where the sessions serve to remind beginning drivers of what they are supposed to do and to rid them of any bad habits they might be developing.

Austria? That made my ears prick up, for some reason. They were quite involved in the original GDE Matrix report. So was Germany, for that matter.

“Austria has achieved good success with the post-test evaluation teaching concept,” Gero Storjohann, Christian Democratic Union transport expert told the paper.

And evaluation of this sort is typical of what the GDE Matrix/coaching thing lives for.

The problem as I see it is that the Germans appear to be assuming that Austria’s 30% lower death rate among young drivers is purely down to this assessment. That, of course, is complete nonsense.

I wonder if this is how the EU is going to slip coaching into the driver training systems of the various member states?

Northern Ireland Introduces Independent Driving

The BBC reports that from 27 June, candidates sitting the driving test in Northern Ireland will have to complete an independent driving section.

The aim of this is to assess whether the candidates can drive safely whilst making decisions independently.

The entire story is pitched – both by the BBC and Environment Minister, Alex Atwood – as if this has never been done before anywhere else. It makes absolutely no mention of the fact that on the mainland we’ve been doing exactly this since last October. It even appears to be trying to avoid the term “independent driving”. Atwood says:

The change I am launching, while a significant addition to the familiar driving test, should hold no fear for candidates.

Well, bully for him, coming up with this totally “unique” idea.

Still, at least one group representing driving instructors in NI was positive about it. That IS a bit different to what happened over here.

DSA Facilities Management Savings

Soapbox RadicalOooooh! This one will get the little DSA-hating rads out there wet about their nether regions!

According to this press release, the DSA has signed a 4-year deal with Interserve for the servicing and maintenance of their sites – a total of 439 properties across the UK. The Dft and VOSA is also included in this deal.

The deal apparently reduces costs by up to 40 per cent of their current value.

The only part which worries me is the fact that it includes switchboard and helpdesk answering services. I hope this doesn’t include bookings.

The reason I say that is that I have direct experience of one such management service provider (Capita) taking over tech support for a large technical product supplier (PC World). In the end, it was like buying a fox to guard your chickens – it seemed cute, but it got ugly very quickly.

Worst Winter on Record Coming?

This article is from 2011, so it is very old. However, someone says the same thing every years, so you can just insert whatever year you like into it.

I saw this scaremongering story from ChoiceQuote – an online insurance website.

ATS Euromaster is advising all drivers to pre-order cold-weather tyres for protection against heavy snow and freezing temperatures. Roughly translated, this means “we don’t want to overstock, but we want to increase sales, too. So we’ll start early this year.” ATS goes on to say it could have sold last year’s stock several times over. Well, yes, because it didn’t have significant stocks (no UK supplier ever has – cold-weather tyres are a new fad over here) and the weather caught everyone out.

Then, they’ve got some weather forecaster predicting unsafe driving conditions…

…during what could be the worst winter on record.

The forecaster is from an organisation called Exacta. A quick look at their website reveals this:

Exacta Weather is a non-profit weather organisation that comprises a team of meteorologists from around the world, who share and supply their data and research with Exacta Weather. All the forecast information they provide is on a purely voluntary basis, they simply have a passion for weather and offer proven track records in accurate long range and seasonal weather forecasting. Exacta Weather will also bring you all the latest weather news from around the globe, which also currently includes long range weather forecasts for the UK, Northern Europe, and the USA.

[Paypal donation button here]

Exacta Weather is a FREE long range weather service that does not charge for forecasts or receive any government funding. Any donations towards operating costs will be highly appreciated.

The key elements here are a “passion” for the weather and the fact that they don’t receive any government funding. It means they’re no more likely to hit the mark than some crazy bloke with seaweed hanging up in his garage, and that they probably consist… of a bunch of crazy people with seaweed hanging up in their garages! I’m not sure if the “data” they obtain are from the organisations they work for (in which case those organisations and their supercomputers will be better able to use those data), or self-generated (back to the seaweed again).

So, in summary, it is two companies feathering their nests by gambling on something for which the outcome cannot be predicted, by scaremongering.

I have a prediction for the winter. It will be generally colder than summer, it might be wet, and it may or may not snow heavily at some point.

EDIT 31/8/2011: Someone wrote to me today to point out that Exacta is a reputable company which has “predicted the last two harsh winters accurately”.

I can’t find the old forecasts so I can’t really comment on those pertaining to the last two winters. Weather forecasters have a habit of making sure that their forecasts look right, and old ones that are wrong tend not to hang around for people to see. However, I did point out that one of their forecasters said of this summer:

It would be adequate to suggest below average temperatures in terms of how I calculate solar activity in my forecasts, so it looks like a summer of grey skies and damp weather, and it’s probably safe to say that there will be no BBQ summer again this year”.

I also issued a warning for torrential downpours and severe flooding.

As I pointed out to the reader, that could be ANY summer. And it’s debatable whether we have actually had a “summer of grey skies and damp weather”. Up this way, it’s been mild with few downpours, and there have been hot spells. Nothing at all like the summer we had three or four years ago – where it really did flood.

So, although I take his point, my scepticism of weather forecasting remains – and any suggestion of a forthcoming harsh winter stands a 50% chance of being right. O h yeah. And if the Met Office and NASA can’t get it 100% right, then no one can – no matter how well-meaning they are.

I also maintain my original stance: that ATS – a major supplier of tyres in the UK – has its own interests at heart.

EDIT 30/9/2011: It has been absolutely bloody boiling these last three days – records being broken for the time of year – and it looks like continuing for several days yet. That certainly didn’t appear in any of the long-range forecasts while they were still long range. However, I note that the information is creeping in as part of those forecasts now we’re actually experiencing it, so I wouldn’t be surprised if someone claimed next year that it was forecast.

Speed Awareness Course Cutbacks

I saw this story in The Blackburn Citizen. Apparently, speed awareness courses – these are where people who have been caught speeding can avoid points on their licences by attending the course – no longer involve a driving element. It’s now all classroom based.

I love the part where they say it is to “cut costs and improve results”.

How will it improve results? The article doesn’t actually say, so you have to do a little bit of surmising and reading between the lines.

According to the council, research by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) is set to be released which suggests that motorists are not benefiting enough from the [practical] driving lessons to justify the cost and time.

It’s hard to see how a practical element – delivered properly, of course – would be of less value than a theoretical element. It’s even harder to see how a purely theoretical approach is, in any shape or form, going to get the message across that speeding is wrong if people don’t already know it (which they do, of course).

On[e] 52-year-old from Chorley, who was caught doing 37mph in a 30mph zone, said he was disappointed not to do the driving on a recent course…

…“But I had been looking forward to the practical element…”

I’ll just point out that if he was “caught doing 37mph” then his speedo would have been showing something closer to 45mph. So rather than being booked on to a speed awareness course he should have been undergoing medical tests to confirm that he wasn’t too stupid to possess a driving licence. He could easily book refresher lessons in his own time if he genuinely acknowledges he is a bad driver, and wasn’t just trying to avoid points (possibly taking him over the limit, of course. The article doesn’t go into that kind of detail) on his licence.

Then there are the inevitable comments to the online story. One, from Chris P Bacon, of Colne, writes:

Anyone stupid enough to pay good money to be dictated to by a load of no-marks wanting to throw around their (non-existent) weight needs to be pitied. If you are foolish enough to infringe a minor driving regulation and even more foolish to get caught, cough the fine and take the points.

This is proof that speed awareness courses don’t work. People with this sort of idiotic attitude are never going to learn. Chris P Bacon obviously thinks that doing 45mph (on your speedo) when it is a 30mph zone is a “minor” issue. Then there is another one from bacupbabe, of Bacup:

I would imagine that all the driving instructors who were employed to do the driving part of the course are now down at the dole. I think dropping the driving part of the course was a good idea. I went on one of these courses to avoid the points. I found the theory part of the test very helpful but the patronising preaching from the driving instructor got on my nerves.

See what I mean? They shouldn’t have licences, and the police are nuts to think that these wishy-washy courses are going to change people who have the intellects of grass.

But going back to the ACPO statement that the practical element wasn’t having any benefits, there is another comment from someone right at the bottom in reply to bacupbabe. It says:

It was suggested, when this scheme first came in, that competent instructors were difficult to find and only those who couldn’t hack it were taken on.

I suspect that this one may be much closer to the mark, because it dovetails with what ACPO has said.

Serves Her Right!

BreathalyzerJenna Pavis, a 27-year old trainee hairdresser from Acomb, has been banned for 2 years for drink-driving in an uninsured car fast at 1am in the morning. She was 2½ times the legal limit.

The usual sob stories came out in court. Apparently, it’s totally out of character. She had 8 years’ no claims bonus (yep. Everyone does until they get caught). She’d had an argument with her boyfriend. And the insurance problem was due to a standing order issue between bank and insurance company which she’d been meaning to get sorted, but which had resulted in the policy being cancelled (after running that through the linguistics computer, it translates as “probably couldn’t afford the payments”).

Apparently, she’d planned to become a mobile hairdresser. So much for that idea.

When you listen to the defence in all these cases, you are forced to conclude that everyone who ever breaks the law is a decent person who never does this sort of thing. The reality is almost certainly that many of the people involved are likely to be doing this sort of thing regularly but just haven’t been caught before.